Earth's Global Energy Budget

by Miklos Zagoni

email: miklos.zagoni@t-online.hu

NASA CERES mission has started twenty years ago

to examine the role of clouds in Earth's radiant energy system;

finally it discovered something more interesting:

small integer ratios between the global mean energy flows.

ONE unit in the system is defined as UNIT ≡ OLR(all-sky)/9.

That is, we are finding ratios between energy flows,

not absolute values of flows: the flux values are scaling with OLR.

Our 'quantum', UNIT = 26.68 Wm

it is derived from the best CERES EBAF TOA 4.0 value of

OLR(all-sky) = 240.12 Wm

The differences from whole number multiples are

within the instrument calibration error of 4.3 Wm

It seems the Earth's global annual mean flux structure is built up

from discrete blocks: 'wave packets' or 'atoms' ... it is quantal.

This structure is neither a CERES observation artifact, nor a coincidence:

it is there in other independent global energy budget estimates,

such as Wild et al. (2015), constrained by BSRN observations:

Stephens et al. (2012) updated global energy balance:

Notice the role of LW CRE as UNIT flux!

L'Ecuyer et al. (2015), adjusted to energy and water cycle constraints:

(Brussels, Atomium)

***

It is evident that this 'atomic theory of climate'

has nothing to do with the Planck-constant nor

the Heisenberg-relations or the Schrödinger-equation.

It means only that the annual mean energy flows in the

global energy budget are 'quantal', F = N x UNIT,

such as the wave numbers of the electromagnetic radiation in a box.

As we trust these atomic structure, we are going to make

a long-term prediction below on this page.

***

This unit, as well as the ratios, have meaningful physical explanation;

see Presentations and Posters below.

The corresponding basic rules and equations:

SFC (SW + LW) absorbed = 2 × TOA LW out (clear-sky)

SFC (SW + LW) absorbed = 2 × TOA LW out + SFC LW CRE (all-sky)

G (greenhouse effect) = SFC Net (turbulent fluxes) (clear-sky)

G (greenhouse effect) = Solar Absorbed Surface (all-sky)

The first and the fourth rules are evident characteristics of the geometric model,

their validity is being kept throughout the deduction;

the second and third rules are consequences for the resulting system.

For details, see NASA GSFC presentation, pp. 62-73.

*

The question is: Why the longwave cloud radiative effect, LWCRE,

plays the role of UNIT flux in the integer multiples structure

(as it is apparent in the above diagrams)?

A most curious point is the SW ATM/SFC = 1/2 breakdown.

But everything goes with 1/2...

From a surface perspective:

What is lost in the open all-sky atmospheric window

is gained back by the blanketing effect of clouds.

The answer to the above question might be this:

The energetic role of clouds is to close the window.

The resulted system is then an 'effectively IR-opaque' atmosphere,

where the F = N × UNIT integer ratios are characteristics

of wave propagation in a cavity.

*

The integer ratios are proved to be valid by independent

global-scale clear-sky radiative transfer computations as well, with

UNIT(clear-sky) = OLR(clear-sky)/4.

According to these ratios, the global energy budget is strictly constrained,

and the fundamental flux structures for clear-sky and all-sky are the followings:

All-sky integer table of fluxes:

Clear-sky integer table of fluxes:

Our results can be visualized by a simple geometric greenhouse model,

a planet surrounded by a 'glass-shell' atmosphere:

Let us emphasize that the validity of the revealed arithmetic structures

is independent from the validity of this proposed conceptual model.

We are convinced that the presented numerical ratios are not resulted

from some hypothesis or theory; they are there in the observed reality.

The apparent arithmetic simplicity of the energy flow distribution

is not a crude oversimplification of an otherwise complex reality,

but expresses the simplicity and clarity of the ruling principles.

*

CERES EBAF Ed4.0 monthly mean data, March 2000 - October 2017:

According to radiative transfer computations,

increasing CO

increases DLR about 1 Wm

This gives +0.08 Wm

As CO

this gives about 0.08 Wm

In contrast, CMIP5 models project + 2 Wm

This would require an amplifying water vapor feedback multiplication factor of 25.

DLR goes with OLR:

***

***

*

Presentations:

Fall 2017 CERES Science Team Meeting (NASA GSFC, Greenbelt/Washington)

Spring 2018 CERES Science Team Meeting (NASA LaRC, Hampton)

Fall 2018 CERES Science Team Meeting (draft)

AGU 2018 Fall Meeting (Washington) (draft)

Posters:

AGU 2017 Fall Meeting (New Orleans)

EGU 2018 General Assembly (Vienna) Poster 1 / Poster 2

8th GEWEX Open Science Conference (Canmore) Poster 1 / Poster 2

American Meteorological Society 15th Conference on Cloud Physics/

15th Conference on Atmospheric Radiation (Vancouver)

2018 CLIVAR WCRP Workshop: Earth Energy Imbalance (Toulouse)

AGU 2018 Fall Meeting (Washington) / Presentation

(This GEWEX Conference is on the Climate and Water Extremes.

In light of the revealed constraints,

we think these extremes might occur on seasonal and regional scales,

while the annual and global means are strictly regulated.)

The GEWEX 2012 Radiation Budget

(with our additions in dark textboxes):

Stefan Dewitte:

EdMZ energy budget with OLR = 240.12 Wm

*

According to Wielicki et al. (1995), before CERES

it was known that the incoming solar = 340 Wm

the reflected solar = 100 Wm

with 240 and 270 Wm

After 18 years of measurements, all-sky data are the same,

the clear-sky data have changed with 2 or 3 Wm

Maybe a more spectacular achievement is the discovery of

direct TOA/surface energetic relationships

and the 'quantal' character of the flux system.

We think NASA CERES Science and Data Teams

performed the quantum measurement of our times

and discovered the discrete ("atomic") structure of Earth's energy flows.

The 2017 Legacy Version of this website is available here.